Okay, so, we need to talk about Making a Murderer. I very much doubt you won’t have heard of it before, but if not go and watch it on Netflix now. Right now. Then come back and read the rest of this post. As a very quick summary, it’s a true crime documentary focusing on Steven Avery, who was wrongly convicted and sent to prison for 18 years then, shortly after his release, was embroiled in another high-profile murder trial. Is he innocent or guilty?
OH MY GOD. I love crime/murder documentaries and it seems like the rest of the world is finally on the same wavelength as me, as Making a Murderer has been all anyone has talked about for the past month. I watched it around Christmas, so have had a couple of weeks to stew it over and read up a bit more on the case. Shot over a 10 year period, filmmakers Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos mainly follow the story of Steven Avery’s trial surrounding the murder of Teresa Halbach. The whole documentary had a very atmospheric feel to it, with lots of cinematic shots and moody scores and in some ways reminded me a lot of Fargo (probably mostly to do with their Midwestern accents and the almost comical incompetency of several parties). However, the thing that sets Making A Murderer apart from films like that is the fact that it is real. Completely and utterly real, even if it’s hard to believe such twists and turns could take place outside the realms of fiction.
Although the documentary is clearly biased towards Avery, they do a good job of not pushing any agendas and leave the conclusion quite open-ended. I think part of what has made Making a Murderer so popular is the fact that no one really knows what happened and pretty much everyone is still sitting on the fence and discussing theories. It’s unusual for me to come away from a documentary like this and not have a strong feeling as to whether he’s innocent or guilty. I’ve also recently watched The Jinx and listened to Serial and, although neither gave a definite conclusion either, I feel like I just know what the right answer is. With Steven Avery’s case, I’m not so sure. My heart is leaning towards innocent, but without access to all the evidence (or, in fact, without all the evidence even existing – thanks to Manitowoc County Sheriff’s Department…) it’s impossible to know what really happened.
What I do know, however, is that there’s no way Steven Avery should have been convicted as guilty in the way that he was. The prosecution’s argument was full of holes and inexplicable timelines, and the evidence they did have seemed too convenient to be true. If I was on the jury, I’m not sure if I could have said he was innocent, but I definitely wouldn’t have said he was guilty. A large part of their argument was formed due to Brendan Dassey’s confession which – I think we can all agree – was completely false, and he was coerced into saying whatever suited the prosecution’s version of events. Out of everyone on the documentary, I feel bad for Brendan the most as there’s no way he’s guilty (can we just take a second for that heartbreaking moment when he asked his mum what inconsistent meant, ARGH POOR INNOCENT CHILD).
Okay, so on to some theories. I don’t have a strong feeling towards one person in particular (again, the lack of evidence and following up on potential leads at the time of the case makes it very hard to point fingers at anyone else) but there are a couple of people involved who seem a bit suspicious. Firstly, the ex-boyfriend Ryan Hillegas and brother Mike Halbach. It’s true what they say about your murderer is more likely to be someone you know than a random stranger, so I think the ex-boyfriend would’ve been a good place to start. The fact that he couldn’t remember when he last saw her, to the fact he was so quickly and deeply involved in the search (remember, EX) and also that he and the brother appear to have deleted some voicemails from Teresa’s phone. I also got the creeps when Mike mentioned something about wanting to “move on without Teresa in our lives” just a day or two after she was reported missing, before anyone had even confirmed Teresa was dead. Hmmmm. My second line of enquiry would be Scott Tadych and Bobby Dassey. They only had each other as alibis, gave very sketchy evidence and seemed strangely happy that Steven was accused of murder. And also the fact that Scott was trying to sell the same type of gun that was used in the murder just a few days later, and Bobby’s timeline didn’t match up with that of the bus driver. All these leads could come to nothing, but the fact that they were never investigated is very frustrating.
This post is getting pretty long now, so I think I’ll restrain myself from any more conspiracy theories! Please tell me you’ve watched it too, I need to DISCUSS. Leave a comment below with your thoughts, or just tell me how much you also love the dream team of Strang and Buting.